• About
  • Login to comment
    • Bluesky
    • RSS
    • Twitter

Now Smell This

a blog about perfume

Menu ▼
  • Perfume Reviews
  • New Perfumes
  • Archives

Bond no. 9 Dubai ~ new fragrances

Posted by Robin on 16 July 2015 37 Comments

Bond No. 9 Dubai Ruby, Indigo and Emerald

Niche line Bond no. 9 has launched Bond No. 9 Dubai, a new trio of fragrances: Ruby, Indigo and Emerald.

When the Empire State mingles with the premier Gulf State, the alluring result is Bond No. 9’s Dubai— a new collection of modernistic New York-inspired Arabian perfumes.

Bond No. 9 Dubai Ruby ~ with bergamot, saffron, davana, rose, magnolia, geranium, amber, sandalwood, myrrh, cypriol and civet.

Bond No. 9 Dubai Indigo ~ with lychee, peach, bergamot, orange blossom, jasmine, peony, white musk, amber, agarwood and oakmoss.

Bond No. 9 Dubai Emerald ~ with saffron, hyssop, rose, gurjum balsam, patchouli, sandalwood, amber, cypriol and leather.

Bond No. 9 Dubai Ruby, Indigo and Emerald can be found now at Harrods in the UK, £480 each for 100 ml Eau de Parfum.

(via harrods)

Possibly of interest

Bond no. 9 Good Oud & Oud Supreme ~ new fragrances
Bond no. 9 New York Chic ~ new fragrance
Bond no. 9 Secret Gardens ~ new fragrance

Filed Under: new fragrances
Tagged With: bond 9

Advertisement


37 Comments

Leave a comment, or read more about commenting at Now Smell This. Here's our privacy policy, and a handy emoticon chart.

  1. APassionateJourney says:
    16 July 2015 at 9:17 am

    As this site was loading, I was yawning (it’s 6:14 am here in the Bay Area) and mid yawn I stopped and saw these bottles and said, “These bottles are beautiful!” Cannot believe my yawn stopped to do that! Hahahah! They really are beautiful, though. My goodness. Only thing that scares me is the LEATHER (Everytime I read notes on nee fragrances I chant over and over, ‘please no leather. Please no leather!’), and civet.

    Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      16 July 2015 at 9:23 am

      Ha! They are beautiful. But given the price, they’d be doing you a favor if all 3 were loaded with leather.

      Log in to Reply
  2. girardEAU says:
    16 July 2015 at 9:24 am

    LOVE the bottles!

    Log in to Reply
    • girardEAU says:
      16 July 2015 at 9:25 am

      HATE the price! 😉

      Log in to Reply
      • Robin says:
        16 July 2015 at 9:51 am

        🙂

        Log in to Reply
  3. Sapphire says:
    16 July 2015 at 9:32 am

    Why indigo and not sapphire??

    Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      16 July 2015 at 9:51 am

      Yeah! I had the same question.

      Log in to Reply
    • des esseintes says:
      16 July 2015 at 10:05 am

      Maybe they weren’t as lucky in getting the patent for ‘indigo’ as they were in getting it for ‘peace’.

      Log in to Reply
      • Marjorie Rose says:
        16 July 2015 at 12:02 pm

        Wait. Bond No. 9 has a trademark on peace?

        Log in to Reply
        • mutzi says:
          16 July 2015 at 12:48 pm

          She apparently believed she did.

          Log in to Reply
  4. Omega says:
    16 July 2015 at 10:10 am

    First Bond bottles that are a love, might be worth a sniff. Don’t think I would like Indigo though, just don’t like lychee..the lychee and peony seem like perhaps they would throw it off for me.

    Log in to Reply
    • Omega says:
      16 July 2015 at 10:12 am

      But why bother a sniff when you know the price?

      Log in to Reply
      • Marjorie Rose says:
        16 July 2015 at 11:05 am

        You know, I completely agree with you on the price making it not worth a sniff for a Bond scent. Unfortunately, I’m learning that there are other brands [cough– Amouage–cough–vintage Guerlains–cough] that somehow that reasonable logic starts to fall apart. . .

        Log in to Reply
        • Omega says:
          16 July 2015 at 1:29 pm

          Agree I haven’t taken a huge liking to this line..why buy a bond when you can buy two Guerlains?

          Log in to Reply
  5. littlecooling says:
    16 July 2015 at 11:58 am

    The bottles are absolutely gorgeous and they kinda sounds interesting, but for that price tag, I think I might pass 😛

    Log in to Reply
  6. scentfromabove says:
    16 July 2015 at 1:03 pm

    Like everyone has said, the bottles are gorgeous, but the prices, not so much! My birthstone is the emerald, so naturally I would want that one so I could keep the bottle. But, the notes in Indigo are more appealing to me. Might try to get some samples, as I have never even smelled anything from the Bond line. Dies anyone have a favorite Bond that you would recommend me getting a sample of?

    Log in to Reply
    • johanob says:
      16 July 2015 at 1:28 pm

      Chinatown!!And New Haarlem is pretty awesome stuff

      Log in to Reply
      • johanob says:
        16 July 2015 at 1:29 pm

        Chinatown for the sheer chypre-fruity fun,New Haarlem for a great coffee-note!

        Log in to Reply
    • pyramus says:
      16 July 2015 at 1:49 pm

      New Haarlem is coffee-soaked GORGEOUSNESS. Great Jones is a wonderful modernized version of an eighties men’s chypre. And I quite liked Brooklyn, Lexington Avenue, So New York, and Bleecker Street back in the day.

      Mind you, I haven’t smelled any of these recently: they were all fantastic five, six, seven years ago, but they could be anything by now.

      Log in to Reply
      • Laurels says:
        16 July 2015 at 7:00 pm

        D’oh! I was at a Bond No. 9 counter a few weeks ago, and got a sample of Chinatown, but forgot about New Haarlem.

        Log in to Reply
  7. Omega says:
    16 July 2015 at 1:31 pm

    I have always heard good things about Chinatown but I didn’t think it was all that when I sniffed it…perhaps another sniff is in order

    Log in to Reply
    • Merlin says:
      16 July 2015 at 3:38 pm

      I think Turin described it as having a lacquer note – like the inside of one of those Chinese boxes. Anyway, he was very enthusiastic about that, but it was the same element that I found off-putting!

      Log in to Reply
  8. Oakland Fresca says:
    16 July 2015 at 1:42 pm

    When the Empire State mingles with the premier Gulf State, the alluring result is $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

    Log in to Reply
    • johanob says:
      16 July 2015 at 2:54 pm

      Couldn’t have said it better myself!!

      Log in to Reply
  9. pyramus says:
    16 July 2015 at 1:42 pm

    Yeah, those bottles are gorgeous, but at those prices (and at that location) they’re obviously aiming for the ungodly rich Middle East market.

    And Indigo is so stupid if your other scents are called Ruby and Emerald. SO stupid. Liz Taylor (or rather the marketing team) knew what was what when she did those three jewel scents.

    Log in to Reply
  10. Merlin says:
    16 July 2015 at 3:40 pm

    I’m wondering what those glass panels are made with? At that price better be the finest crystal! 😀

    Log in to Reply
    • nathanthomas50 says:
      16 July 2015 at 5:02 pm

      No glass panels, just a transparent coloured bottle with the gold printed around to make it look like a panel. Not as nice in the flesh as when it’s lit and photoshopped for the photo !

      Log in to Reply
      • Merlin says:
        16 July 2015 at 5:11 pm

        Oh! Thanks for letting me know 🙂

        A number of perfume bottles have been made using the domed arabesque design, but I do like the way the motif has been adapted to fit the Bond bottle.

        It’s unfortunate how many bottles look better in photos than in real life.

        Log in to Reply
        • nathanthomas50 says:
          16 July 2015 at 5:26 pm

          Absolutely ! For the price they’re charging it would have been nice for the gold to be a pierced metal sleeve with the coloured bottle inside rather than just a printed design. I think the clear panel would annoy me too as the fill level of the bottle drops and you have the colour variation between the empty and filled portion – but maybe that’s just me and my OCD ! Lol

          Log in to Reply
          • Merlin says:
            16 July 2015 at 7:43 pm

            So the glass is actually clear? I’m the opposite of OCD (terribly sloppy) and it would definitely annoy me if I ended up with a clear bottle after using up the perfume. (Not to mention the aesthetic of a half-full bottle…)

            And yes, for the price one might have thought a metal sleeve was viable!

            Oh well, since I would never ever pay that much to begin with, I guess my theoretical gripes are irrelevant 🙂

        • nathanthomas50 says:
          16 July 2015 at 8:04 pm

          Oooh no, the bottles are coloured but the juice isn’t totally clear so you’ll still see the fill level through the glass. Cheap Coloured glass bottle + gold printing + juice that costs a few pounds to make = selling price of £480 just doesn’t add up – at least Roja dove sticks a few tacky fake jewels onto his bottles to make them REALLY tacky opulent !

          Log in to Reply
          • Merlin says:
            16 July 2015 at 9:27 pm

            This is tacky-elegant-opulence 🙂

  11. Ida says:
    16 July 2015 at 7:28 pm

    I find the names off-putting. A bit tacky opulent.

    Log in to Reply
    • Merlin says:
      16 July 2015 at 7:44 pm

      From NathanThomas’ description of the bottles it sounds like they too are tacky-opulent 😉

      Log in to Reply
      • johanob says:
        17 July 2015 at 8:33 am

        At least there are no swarovski crystals in sight….

        Log in to Reply
  12. Sabrina20 says:
    22 July 2015 at 10:49 pm

    These look amazing! When will they be in Harvey Nichols Dubai?!

    Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      23 July 2015 at 8:50 am

      No idea, sorry.

      Log in to Reply

Leave a reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Advertisement

Search

Recent reviews

Atelier Cologne Love Osmanthus
Moschino Toy Boy
Arquiste Misfit
Diptyque Eau Capitale
Zoologist Bee
Parfum d’Empire Immortelle Corse
Comme des Garcons Series 10 Clash
Frédéric Malle Rose & Cuir
L’Artisan Parfumeur Le Chant de Camargue
Yves Saint Laurent Grain de Poudre
Régime des Fleurs Chloë Sevigny Little Flower
Chanel 1957
Gallivant Los Angeles
Amouage Portrayal Woman

Blogroll

Bois de Jasmin
Grain de Musc
Perfume Posse
The Non-Blonde
More blogs...

Perfumista lists

100 fragrances every perfumista should try
And 25 more fragrances every perfumista should smell
50 masculine fragrances every perfumista should try
26 vintage fragrances every perfumista should try
25 rose fragrances every perfumista should try
11 Cheap Perfumes Beauty Outsiders Love

Favorite posts

The Great Perfume Reduction Plan
Why I Love Old School Chypres
New to perfume and want to learn more?
How to make fragrance last through the day
Fragrance concentrations: sorting it all out
On reformulations, or why your favorite perfume doesn’t smell like it used to
How to get fragrance samples
Perfume for Life: How Long Will Your Fragrance Collection Last?

Upcoming

List of upcoming Friday projects

6 January ~ damage poll

31 January ~ winter reading poll

Back to Top

Home
Archives
About Now Smell This :: Privacy Policy
Perfume Reviews
New Perfumes
General Perfume Articles
The Monday Mail

Glossary of Perfume Terms
Perfume FAQ
Perfume Books

Noses ~ Perfumers A-E :: F-K :: L-S :: T-Z

Perfume Houses A-B :: C :: D-E :: F-G
H-J :: K-L :: M :: N-O :: P :: Q-R :: S
T :: U-Z

Copyright © 2005-2026 Now Smell This. All rights reserved.