• About
  • Login to comment
    • Bluesky
    • RSS
    • Twitter

Now Smell This

a blog about perfume

Menu ▼
  • Perfume Reviews
  • New Perfumes
  • Archives

Dries Van Noten par Frederic Malle ~ new fragrance

Posted by Robin on 1 February 2013 34 Comments

Dries Van Noten par Frédéric Malle

Next up from Frédéric Malle will be Dries Van Noten par Frédéric Malle, a new fragrance made in collaboration with the Belgian designer, and the first of "a series of fragrance portraits of highly creative, interesting people".

The modern oriental was developed by perfumer Bruno Jovanovic; the notes include “soft, sweet, creamy and milky” sandalwood, plus saffron, vanilla, jasmine and musks.

Dries Van Noten par Frédéric Malle will be available in 50 ($185) and 100 ($265) ml. It will launch this month, but will not reach the US until April.

(via wwd)

Update: Additional notes include bergamot, lemon, nutmeg, clove, patchouli, violet wood, sacraosol (sulfurol) and Peruvian balm. (via fashionmonitor)

Another update: see a review of Dries Van Noten par Frédéric Malle.

Filed Under: new fragrances
Tagged With: bruno jovanovic, dries van noten, frederic malle

Advertisement


34 Comments

Leave a comment, or read more about commenting at Now Smell This. Here's our privacy policy, and a handy emoticon chart.

  1. pigoletto says:
    1 February 2013 at 7:29 am

    w a n t.

    Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      1 February 2013 at 9:14 am

      It sounds nice — look forward to trying it.

      Log in to Reply
  2. dpastuck says:
    1 February 2013 at 7:44 am

    i’m happy he did this in collaboration with Malle rather than having a go at fragrance on his own with a license. And it sounds lovely!

    Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      1 February 2013 at 9:14 am

      Would think that was wise for both parties.

      Log in to Reply
      • C.H. says:
        1 February 2013 at 12:02 pm

        Yeah, I definitely see this as burnishing the high-brow credentials of both parties. If anything I’m surprised that more designers don’t want to go this route–to do fragrances that match/enhance their high-art brand. I realize mass market fragrances offer fast cash, but luxury brands tend to make a lot of choices that aren’t immediately lucrative, for the sake of establishing or preserving their cachet. It’s curious to me where they think it’s ok to do things with more mass-appeal and where it’s def not (mediocre fragrance, yes; size 14 dress, no.)

        Log in to Reply
        • Robin says:
          1 February 2013 at 12:10 pm

          I kind of doubt many get the chance…doubt anyone turns down Frederic Malle unless they have bigger plans.

          Log in to Reply
          • C.H. says:
            1 February 2013 at 9:27 pm

            Hahaha, well yes I suppose there is that! But he’s not literally the only high-brow perfumer who could plausibly lend cachet to design houses– and vice versa, as actually sometimes the reverse surprises me as well, that fairly exclusive fragrance lines collaborate with much wider-market partners. Feels surprising to me that Le Labo has collaborated with Anthropologie and Fairmont Hotels–it strikes me that they could have positioned themselves instead as, say, a Band of Outsiders and SoHo House partner (i.e. more exclusive art-y brands.)

            I mean, I am certainly happy some of their work is more widely available, and I am sure the money was very good on both of those deals! Just interesting to me, as a matter of brand strategy.

  3. Annikky says:
    1 February 2013 at 7:56 am

    This is my kind of celebrity scent – for once, “highly creative and interesting” is indeed an accurate description. I’m really curious to see how van Noten’s vision translates into fragrance. Hope it’s not too sweet, as sweet is usually problematic for me and I would never describe Dries van Noten’s style as sweet either. It would be interesting to compare this one to the new Marni, as I think of those designers as occupying similar territory – no obsession with “sexy”, refined use of color and print, a general thoughtfulness. Not that their stuff looks the same, of course, and while Marni can be described as “quirky”, van Noten is more of an intellectual.

    Log in to Reply
    • Bee says:
      1 February 2013 at 10:30 am

      well said, I fully agree – and I love my vintage van Noten overcoat, so that makes me an intellectual? 🙂

      Log in to Reply
      • Annikky says:
        1 February 2013 at 10:48 am

        You’ve got excellent taste in designers and comments, so of course you are an intellectual ;)!

        Log in to Reply
      • C.H. says:
        1 February 2013 at 12:04 pm

        Ooh, envious of your overcoat! Favorite scent to wear with it?

        Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      1 February 2013 at 10:48 am

      You know way more about both brands than I do 🙂

      Log in to Reply
      • Annikky says:
        1 February 2013 at 11:02 am

        As I well should, considering the absolutely ridiculous amount of time I have spent following (and occasionally writing about) fashion 🙂

        Log in to Reply
    • C.H. says:
      1 February 2013 at 11:52 am

      Such an interesting question–is this best understood as a celebrity scent or is it a design house scent? Because it’s certainly true that “soft and sweet” is a pretty long distance from how I would describe the Dries Van Noten line, but maybe that’s what Dries Van Noten the person is actually like?

      Log in to Reply
      • Robin says:
        1 February 2013 at 12:10 pm

        Gosh, I’m thinking of it as a designer fragrance, niche. I don’t think he qualifies as a celebrity in any usual sense.

        Log in to Reply
        • C.H. says:
          1 February 2013 at 9:01 pm

          Yeah, I’d definitely expect it more to be a fragrance for the design house, but it seems striking that it’s advertised as part of a “series of fragrance portraits of highly creative, interesting people.” Potentially more along the lines of ELDO’s Tilda Swinton or the Alan Cumming fragrances from CB I Hate Perfume? (I realize it may not make that much difference, in the end, for what the fragrance will smell like–it’s of course not like all design house fragrances smell one way, and fragrances associated with a particular personality smell another way. I’m just sort of curious about how they’re thinking about it.)

          Log in to Reply
          • Annikky says:
            2 February 2013 at 5:08 am

            Yes, I am curious about that as well. I was only partly joking when I called it a celebrity scent, as the focus seems to be on the person rather than the brand, although in the case of DVN it’s of course difficult to separate the two. We’ll probably learn more when it comes out and the choice of next partnership will also clarify the concept. Not that all this matters in terms of the scent, I just find the communication/marketing angle interesting as well.

          • C.H. says:
            2 February 2013 at 4:21 pm

            Yeah–also, while I realize the world in which Dries Van Noten has name recognition is a relatively small one, within that world he’s a MUCH bigger star than lots of actors who have a fragrance are in their world. He’s really an A list designer while lots of B and C list actors get fragrances!

            Of course I do realize the profitability of celebrity fragrances probably depends on name recognition in absolute rather than relative terms! But just to say that to some, Dries Van Noten is a kind of celebrity 🙂

          • C.H. says:
            8 February 2013 at 11:52 am

            Aha! So FM has named Rem Koolhaas as another example of the kind of person he’d like to add to this series. That makes it sound like it is at least partially about people who are stars within their field rather than necessarily or solely about using clothes and perfume each to help sell the other.

    • nozknoz says:
      1 February 2013 at 9:31 pm

      Interesting analysis – thanks, Annikky!

      Log in to Reply
  4. Abyss says:
    1 February 2013 at 9:39 am

    Oh this sounds nice. Does anyone know if it’ll be sold as a part of Malle range or will it have some annoying, exclusive distribution?

    Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      1 February 2013 at 10:47 am

      I’m assuming it will have the same annoying distribution as the regular Malles…they say “a global distribution of specialty stores numbering less than 100”, which sounds about like what they already do, right?

      Log in to Reply
      • Abyss says:
        1 February 2013 at 12:04 pm

        Ha, yes! Sounds like the standard annoying distribution rather than the extra-annoying one (e.g Outrageous).

        Log in to Reply
        • Robin says:
          1 February 2013 at 12:11 pm

          Ah, yes, Outrageous. I never understood that one — the scent OR the distribution. It was like they were ashamed of it.

          Log in to Reply
          • sayitisntso says:
            1 February 2013 at 9:44 pm

            Outrageous is a Malle scent made specifically for the retailer Barney’s New York. There’s even a small Barney’s Co-Op logo on the Outrageous label. Why Barney’s? I think that Barney’s was the very first US door for the Malle line – so perhaps it was ‘thank you’ from Malle himself.

          • Robin says:
            2 February 2013 at 9:22 am

            Right, I know, but it was an odd, not-Malle-like thank you (thanks guys, and here’s a scent I’d never put in my regular line), and a waste of Sophia Grojsman’s time, IMHO.

  5. AnnE says:
    1 February 2013 at 3:32 pm

    This sounds lovely. I honestly doubt I could pick out the Dries Van Noten outfit from a line-up, but this scent is going on my must-try list.

    Log in to Reply
  6. littlecooling says:
    1 February 2013 at 4:26 pm

    This could actually be pretty interesting. It’s two great brands, that goes together to create someting creative, interesting. I can’t wait.
    Great simple bottle 🙂

    Log in to Reply
  7. Marjorie Rose says:
    1 February 2013 at 8:40 pm

    How long ago was the last FM new release? I feel like this may be the first one for me since I’ve fallen down the rabbit hole. I’m happy to think I could sample a new Malle–and I wonder how long before it gets added to that coffret I’ve been pretending I don’t know about?

    Log in to Reply
  8. dolcesarah says:
    2 February 2013 at 9:40 am

    Will have

    Log in to Reply
  9. dolcesarah says:
    2 February 2013 at 9:41 am

    Saffron is delightful this time of year. Late summer too. Good for weather extremes !!!

    Log in to Reply
  10. kaos.geo says:
    6 February 2013 at 11:56 am

    I am intrigued about the “sulfurol” …. for me when somethings smells of sulfur, it means it has gone bad!

    Log in to Reply
  11. Supersmell says:
    22 February 2013 at 9:30 am

    Shivering with anticipation (and cold) I tried this yesterday from a pre-pre sample in a specialized perfume shop.

    Generic chemical wood.

    And I am a Dries van Noten fan.

    Log in to Reply
  12. Das says:
    8 March 2013 at 10:37 pm

    Our Seattle Barney’s had a tester bottle this past weekend, so I was lucky to get a sample. The opening *was* all about the milky sandalwood, I loved it! Then it became ambery and a mix of things … vanilla, a hint of violet? and something like leather? The “Additional notes” above sound right, with the sandalwood still very prominent. I think I’m going to enjoy this one 🙂

    Log in to Reply

Leave a reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Advertisement

Search

Recent reviews

Atelier Cologne Love Osmanthus
Moschino Toy Boy
Arquiste Misfit
Diptyque Eau Capitale
Zoologist Bee
Parfum d’Empire Immortelle Corse
Comme des Garcons Series 10 Clash
Frédéric Malle Rose & Cuir
L’Artisan Parfumeur Le Chant de Camargue
Yves Saint Laurent Grain de Poudre
Régime des Fleurs Chloë Sevigny Little Flower
Chanel 1957
Gallivant Los Angeles
Amouage Portrayal Woman

Blogroll

Bois de Jasmin
Grain de Musc
Perfume Posse
The Non-Blonde
More blogs...

Perfumista lists

100 fragrances every perfumista should try
And 25 more fragrances every perfumista should smell
50 masculine fragrances every perfumista should try
26 vintage fragrances every perfumista should try
25 rose fragrances every perfumista should try
11 Cheap Perfumes Beauty Outsiders Love

Favorite posts

The Great Perfume Reduction Plan
Why I Love Old School Chypres
New to perfume and want to learn more?
How to make fragrance last through the day
Fragrance concentrations: sorting it all out
On reformulations, or why your favorite perfume doesn’t smell like it used to
How to get fragrance samples
Perfume for Life: How Long Will Your Fragrance Collection Last?

Upcoming

List of upcoming Friday projects

6 January ~ damage poll

31 January ~ winter reading poll

Back to Top

Home
Archives
About Now Smell This :: Privacy Policy
Perfume Reviews
New Perfumes
General Perfume Articles
The Monday Mail

Glossary of Perfume Terms
Perfume FAQ
Perfume Books

Noses ~ Perfumers A-E :: F-K :: L-S :: T-Z

Perfume Houses A-B :: C :: D-E :: F-G
H-J :: K-L :: M :: N-O :: P :: Q-R :: S
T :: U-Z

Copyright © 2005-2026 Now Smell This. All rights reserved.