• About
  • Login to comment
    • Bluesky
    • RSS
    • Twitter

Now Smell This

a blog about perfume

Menu ▼
  • Perfume Reviews
  • New Perfumes
  • Archives

Bunch o’ limited edition collector bottles 2009, part 14

Posted by Robin on 15 December 2009 48 Comments

More limited edition collector fragrance bottles, with the usual disclaimers: in most of these cases, the juice is unchanged, just the bottle is “special” (or not, as the case may be), and some of these may not be available in the US.

By Kilian coffret

Strictly speaking these aren't collector bottles and I don't know if the set is limited edition (so why is it here? I suppose because it had nowhere else to go), but By Kilian will launch a coffret in February with 7.5 ml bottles of all eight of the fragrances in the L’Oeuvre Noire / Black Masterpiece collection. 95€. (via marieclaire.fr)


Marc Jacob Daisy Garland edition

Marc Jacob's ever-popular Daisy fragrance in the Garland edition, featuring blue daisies on the cap and a blue & white daisy garland. In 50 ml Eau de Toilette, due to launch in February. (via moodiereport)


Guerlain Mitsouko Baccarat edition

From Guerlain, the iconic Mitsouko fragrance in a special limited edition bottle to celebrate the fragrance's 90th anniversary: "Mitsouko is 90 this year! To mark the occasion, Guerlain is offering a limited, numbered edition of 14 bottles of Extract in Baccarat crystal decorated with an original jewel in jade and pearls. Only 5 of these will be sold in the United States." Pretty, no? 450 ml, $7000, available for pre-order at Neiman Marcus.


DKNY Be Delicious Fresh Blossom Delicious Art edition

From Donna Karan, DKNY Be Delicious Fresh Blossom in the Delicious Art edition. $55 at Dillards.


Estee Lauder Beautiful Eau de Parfum Purse Spray

From Estee Lauder, Beautiful in an Eau de Parfum Purse Spray: "From the Beautiful Celebration Limited Edition Collection. Fall in love all over again with the fragrance of a thousand flowers. This golden Purse Spray is perfectly sized to take anywhere. The gleaming design evokes a timeless heirloom. Comes filled, and with 1 refill." $80 at Estee Lauder.

Filed Under: fragrance shopping
Tagged With: by kilian, collector bottles, donna karan, estee lauder, guerlain, limited edition, marc jacobs

Advertisement


48 Comments

Leave a comment, or read more about commenting at Now Smell This. Here's our privacy policy, and a handy emoticon chart.

  1. miss kitty v. says:
    15 December 2009 at 11:12 am

    Ohhhh… that Mitsouko is beautiful! Good thing I don’t like Mitsouko. 😉 (And there are so many other things I could do with $7,000.)

    Log in to Reply
    • mals86 says:
      15 December 2009 at 11:25 am

      Yep, counting blessings today.

      Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      15 December 2009 at 11:32 am

      Yep — I’d take the cash.

      Log in to Reply
      • Dolly says:
        15 December 2009 at 5:57 pm

        The money would come in handy. Think of all the fragrances one could buy with $ 7000.00. That bottle is nice though.

        Log in to Reply
    • platinum14 says:
      15 December 2009 at 12:12 pm

      For $7000 AND 450ml you REALLY gotta love Mitsouko a whole lot!

      Log in to Reply
    • Rappleyea says:
      15 December 2009 at 2:01 pm

      Great bottle and lots of juice for seven grand, but….. it’s the REFORMULATED juice!

      Log in to Reply
  2. pigoletto says:
    15 December 2009 at 11:21 am

    I’m going to step up and say that if I won the lottery tomorrow, I’d buy that Mitsouko.

    Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      15 December 2009 at 11:32 am

      It’s mighty cute.

      Log in to Reply
  3. parfumliefhebber says:
    15 December 2009 at 11:24 am

    The Daisy bottle is cute, but I can’t smell it. It is gone the moment I spray it. Also from the bottle I smell nothing. The Mitsouko bottle is très chic, also is the price 😉

    Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      15 December 2009 at 11:32 am

      You’re probably anosmic to the musk in Daisy then.

      Log in to Reply
  4. mals86 says:
    15 December 2009 at 11:35 am

    The By Kilian coffret is relatively inexpensive, as compared to their fancy-pants boxed bottles; wonder if we’ll see some splits of those? By my calculations… ahem… each bottle is about $18 US.

    If these get split up, I might have to reconsider that whole “No trying any By Kilians” mindset.

    Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      15 December 2009 at 11:37 am

      My guess is that there will be much split action 🙂

      Log in to Reply
    • CynthiaW says:
      15 December 2009 at 12:39 pm

      If you end up liking any of the by Kilians, you could buy one of their regular travel refill sets – they’re $70 for four .25 oz vials. Saks doesn’t enforce the whole “you have to have bought the expensive atomizer first” thing either.

      Log in to Reply
      • miss kitty v. says:
        15 December 2009 at 2:18 pm

        And thank you for telling me about that, Cynthia. I was able to go on there and buy the travel refills as a gift for someone. TOTALLY affordable with the free shipping plus the new customer 10% off. In fact, I’m wishing I had stocked up.

        Log in to Reply
        • CynthiaW says:
          15 December 2009 at 8:40 pm

          lol – I guess I’ve mentioned that a *few* times since we found out how to get around buying the overpriced bottles. I’m trying to earn my enabler badge, you know. 😉

          Log in to Reply
          • miss kitty v. says:
            15 December 2009 at 9:55 pm

            Oh, I think you’ve got the deluxe Swarovski crystal-encrusted enabler badge now! 😉

    • Rappleyea says:
      15 December 2009 at 2:04 pm

      I have to say that I have really enjoyed the By Kilian samples that the gracious Miss Kitty sent me. Much, much better quality than I thought they’d be. I’d definitely be interested in splitting up some of these.

      Log in to Reply
      • miss kitty v. says:
        15 December 2009 at 2:16 pm

        (rubs hands together… cackles…)

        Log in to Reply
        • Rappleyea says:
          15 December 2009 at 3:07 pm

          LOL! Ain’t if fun to enable someone? I know I love it. We need to hold an annual (semi-annual?) Enablers’ Awards Dinner.

          Log in to Reply
    • kalynna says:
      15 December 2009 at 4:26 pm

      Hmmm, I could go for an $18 bottle of Back to Black!

      Log in to Reply
  5. CynthiaW says:
    15 December 2009 at 11:37 am

    Ugh… I love that Mitsouko bottle, I love Mitsouko as well – and yet, the $7,000 price tag makes me want to punch someone at LMVH

    Log in to Reply
    • boojum says:
      15 December 2009 at 11:54 am

      It only makes me want to punch the people who can afford it. 😀

      Log in to Reply
      • Robin says:
        15 December 2009 at 1:47 pm

        LOL…where’s the holiday cheer, ladies?

        Log in to Reply
        • CynthiaW says:
          15 December 2009 at 9:55 pm

          Nothing to do with the holidays, I’m just opposed to overpriced packaging in general. 🙂

          I’m pretty sure that, even if I had the money, I wouldn’t spend it on a bottle. Heck, it costs more than my first car!

          Log in to Reply
          • Robin says:
            15 December 2009 at 10:26 pm

            So am I, and I’m sure that’s more than my first car too. And it’s more than half the price of my last car, for that matter, which I bought new!

  6. Joe says:
    15 December 2009 at 11:54 am

    Maybe I need to see a better-quality image of that Mitsouko bottle than is coming through on my phone — that greenish “blob” around the neck is a little strange and affects the lines of the bottle. Again, I think part of it is the image quality I’m seeing.

    Wish more houses would do more sets like the ByKilian. Nice.

    Log in to Reply
    • monkeytoe says:
      15 December 2009 at 1:24 pm

      The label makes it look like the Fleur de Lotus bottle.

      Log in to Reply
      • Robin says:
        15 December 2009 at 2:51 pm

        Yes, it does!

        Log in to Reply
        • monkeytoe says:
          15 December 2009 at 3:26 pm

          And NM misspelled Mitsouko on the website! For $7,000 I want a proofreader to check copy. Hrrumpf.

          Log in to Reply
          • Robin says:
            15 December 2009 at 5:58 pm

            LOL!

      • miss kitty v. says:
        15 December 2009 at 3:28 pm

        I was all excited at first because I thought it *was* Fleur de Lotus. I missed my chance with that one, and for reasons I can’t put my finger on, desperately wanted to try it.

        Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      15 December 2009 at 1:47 pm

      It isn’t an ultra-sharp picture in any case, but those are pretty jade flowers…

      Log in to Reply
  7. jonr951 says:
    15 December 2009 at 2:15 pm

    Is the Daisy Garland edition suppose 2 b the Daisy In The Air?

    Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      15 December 2009 at 2:52 pm

      You know, I’m really not sure: I’d heard Daisy in the Air edition had/ blue flowers, so they might well be one & the same thing.

      Log in to Reply
  8. perfumegeek says:
    15 December 2009 at 2:27 pm

    I’m loving those little jade flowers on the Mitsuoko bottle. I wonder how genuine they are…hmmm. Might the jade material be the source of the steep price tag?

    Re: Daisy….the garland bottles are cute…my fave color is blue. But no matter how hard I try to like the scent (multiple sprays at Sephora) it always leaves me empty. It smells too one dimensional on me. Can I dump out the juice and refill it with Amaranthine? Hehehe

    Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      15 December 2009 at 2:53 pm

      LOL…Amaranthine with white vinyl flowers! Does not compute 😉

      Log in to Reply
      • perfumegeek says:
        15 December 2009 at 5:17 pm

        LOL, yeah I’m weird. Amaranthine seems the only obvious floral I like now. Would it be more suitable if the bottle is painted with swirly colors and topped with bananas instead of daisies?

        Log in to Reply
  9. asuperlongusername says:
    15 December 2009 at 5:50 pm

    You know, I recently went to my local SAKS and sniffed out the By Killians. I was kind of unimpressed. I guess maybe because I was trying them on strips but they didn’t do a thing for me there. I am kind of wanting to try their newest ones, though….

    Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      15 December 2009 at 5:59 pm

      It isn’t my favorite line, although I do think they’re well done.

      Log in to Reply
    • CynthiaW says:
      15 December 2009 at 8:42 pm

      Even after trying them on skin, the only one that I liked enough to buy and wear was Back to Black. All of the rest of them were only “okay” – well done, but nothing that I needed.

      Log in to Reply
  10. Dolly says:
    15 December 2009 at 5:59 pm

    The DK bottle kind of reminds me of Tickle deodorant back in the day, only shorter.

    Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      15 December 2009 at 7:38 pm

      Don’t remember Tickle…what a funny name for a deodorant!

      Log in to Reply
    • miss kitty v. says:
      15 December 2009 at 7:43 pm

      OMG, Tickle! I always thought it looked like a, uh, “personal massager.” 😉 A friend of mine didn’t remember Tickle, and when I showed her an old ad I found she screamed.

      Log in to Reply
  11. Absolute Scentualist says:
    15 December 2009 at 9:04 pm

    So does the By Kilian set include all of their original launches, just not the two newer ones? I’m a bit confused. But if it does, I am totally in on a split. All of them looked appealing. I just couldn’t get over the ridiculous packaging, but could totally get down with the splitting the set idea. 😉

    Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      15 December 2009 at 9:43 pm

      I think it’s that whole collection…the original 6 + 2 new ones. (There are a total of 9 fragrances, but 1, I think it’s the Pure Oud, is a new collection: Arabian Nights)

      Log in to Reply
      • miss kitty v. says:
        15 December 2009 at 9:56 pm

        Wow, that might be as close as we get to an affordable bottle of the Pure Oud!

        Log in to Reply
      • Absolute Scentualist says:
        16 December 2009 at 12:58 am

        Great. Thanks Robin. *ratchets up the want even higher*

        Log in to Reply
      • Robin says:
        16 December 2009 at 9:35 am

        I hope I was clear — pretty sure this means Pure Oud is NOT in this set.

        Log in to Reply

Leave a reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Advertisement

Search

Recent reviews

Atelier Cologne Love Osmanthus
Moschino Toy Boy
Arquiste Misfit
Diptyque Eau Capitale
Zoologist Bee
Parfum d’Empire Immortelle Corse
Comme des Garcons Series 10 Clash
Frédéric Malle Rose & Cuir
L’Artisan Parfumeur Le Chant de Camargue
Yves Saint Laurent Grain de Poudre
Régime des Fleurs Chloë Sevigny Little Flower
Chanel 1957
Gallivant Los Angeles
Amouage Portrayal Woman

Blogroll

Bois de Jasmin
Grain de Musc
Perfume Posse
The Non-Blonde
More blogs...

Perfumista lists

100 fragrances every perfumista should try
And 25 more fragrances every perfumista should smell
50 masculine fragrances every perfumista should try
26 vintage fragrances every perfumista should try
25 rose fragrances every perfumista should try
11 Cheap Perfumes Beauty Outsiders Love

Favorite posts

The Great Perfume Reduction Plan
Why I Love Old School Chypres
New to perfume and want to learn more?
How to make fragrance last through the day
Fragrance concentrations: sorting it all out
On reformulations, or why your favorite perfume doesn’t smell like it used to
How to get fragrance samples
Perfume for Life: How Long Will Your Fragrance Collection Last?

Upcoming

List of upcoming Friday projects

6 January ~ damage poll

31 January ~ winter reading poll

Back to Top

Home
Archives
About Now Smell This :: Privacy Policy
Perfume Reviews
New Perfumes
General Perfume Articles
The Monday Mail

Glossary of Perfume Terms
Perfume FAQ
Perfume Books

Noses ~ Perfumers A-E :: F-K :: L-S :: T-Z

Perfume Houses A-B :: C :: D-E :: F-G
H-J :: K-L :: M :: N-O :: P :: Q-R :: S
T :: U-Z

Copyright © 2005-2026 Now Smell This. All rights reserved.