• About
  • Login to comment
    • Bluesky
    • RSS
    • Twitter

Now Smell This

a blog about perfume

Menu ▼
  • Perfume Reviews
  • New Perfumes
  • Archives

Byredo Blanche ~ new fragrance

Posted by Robin on 24 July 2009 90 Comments

Byredo Blanche perfume

Byredo has launched Blanche, the niche line's eight fragrance. According to Byredo founder Ben Gorham:

The idea for Blanche is, as the name suggests, built around my perception of the colour white. For the first time i actually made a fragrance for and with a specific person in mind.

I wanted to capture her innocent and untainted side, with a fragrance almost transparent in nature. Blanche also represents an appreciation for classic beauty.

The fragrance is pure and simple in structure but extreme in character.

Blanche features notes of white rose, pink pepper, aldehydes, violet, neroli, peony, blonde woods, sandalwood and musk.

Byredo Blanche is available in 100 ml Eau de Parfum, $195. (via shop.byredo)

Filed Under: new fragrances
Tagged With: byredo

Advertisement


90 Comments

Leave a comment, or read more about commenting at Now Smell This. Here's our privacy policy, and a handy emoticon chart.

  1. boojum says:
    24 July 2009 at 2:39 pm

    Hmmm. Sounds lovely, but will it be worth the price? Marking this one down for a sample…

    Log in to Reply
    • Daisy says:
      24 July 2009 at 3:03 pm

      I really love the “BIG-NESS” of Pulp….with the description above I wonder if it’s sheer and light? It just doesn’t sound very ‘Byredo’….does that make any sense?

      Log in to Reply
      • miss kitty v. says:
        24 July 2009 at 3:09 pm

        I know exactly what you mean. But maybe this will be Byredo’s version of sheer and light? Which will really mean, not as big as the other fragrances, but still big?

        I’ll have to try this one. I like everything else of theirs that I’ve tried, which is unfortunate. Well, financially unfortunate, I should say.

        Log in to Reply
      • Joe says:
        24 July 2009 at 4:25 pm

        Except Bal d’Afrique isn’t BIG, either. I don’t think their intent is for everything to be a blast-your-nosehairs experience. 😀

        Log in to Reply
        • Daisy says:
          24 July 2009 at 4:34 pm

          maybe my nosehairs LIKE being blasted off! hahahaha you know I like BIG fragrances. I didn’t try Bal d’Afrique because some of the “earthier” notes mentioned in Kevin’s review. You know me, all pristine notes and clean musk, butter wouldn’t melt in my mouth type. 😉

          Log in to Reply
          • Joe says:
            24 July 2009 at 5:33 pm

            Oh, I don’t think of you as a BIG fragrance person, so much. You love your Clair de Musc, your Hiris, your Philosykos well enough. You and I do agree though, that anything we wear needs to be BIG enough that we can smell our own sillage.

        • miss kitty v. says:
          24 July 2009 at 4:51 pm

          That’s weird, because Bal D’Afrique IS big on me. It also smells strangely like Dzing! somwhere in the first 15 minutes–I don’t know if anyone else had the same experience. After that, it doesn’t really smell similar at all.

          Log in to Reply
          • Joe says:
            24 July 2009 at 5:31 pm

            Miss Kitty: the problem is probably those eetsy-beetsy little vials from which one has to DAB. Thus dabbed, BdA wasn’t big to me And of course I can never bring myself to DUMP the whole vial on me at once and leave nothing for future testing. It is just a horrible dilemma, this sampling!

            I’d like to borrow your bottle with which to do my favorite: the ten-spritz job up and down the torso, neck, arms… then I can truly APPRECIATE a fragrance. Ahhh. Vials are the bane of my existence in more ways than one, but one can’t have everything.

          • Daisy says:
            24 July 2009 at 6:34 pm

            “the Ten Spritz Job”….that’s what we call “spraying with abandon” around here! But of course that’s what I do too! I like to exist in my own little bubble of fragrance.

          • Kacy says:
            24 July 2009 at 6:49 pm

            Amen,I don’t like the sample vials either. I feel I need to be able to walk through a cloud of a perfume to really test 😉

            Unfortunately, going up to the 1.5 spray vials is so much more money 🙁

            As for Byredo having all big perfumes, I have Gypsy Water, but I don’t think of it as big…

          • miss kitty v. says:
            24 July 2009 at 11:36 pm

            Yeah, this is why I order the spray samples at TPC. I’ve decided to forgo any little dabby vials unless that’s the only option. (According to spellcheck, I just made up the word “dabby,” which I define as “things that you dab on rather than spray.”)

          • Daisy says:
            25 July 2009 at 10:01 pm

            Always good to add to the lexicon Kitty….we perfume enthusiasts understand descriptives like “dabby” immediately….that sort of recognition is part of our genetic code!! That allele certainly being located on the little known Lemming Gene….

            But what I wanted to say is —you really need to set yourself up with some dabby vials and start swapping!!!

          • miss kitty v. says:
            25 July 2009 at 11:20 pm

            Have the dabby bottles, have been swapping. 🙂

    • Robin says:
      24 July 2009 at 3:07 pm

      I still have not tried them all, but do love Pulp. The price is too steep for me though.

      Log in to Reply
      • miss kitty v. says:
        24 July 2009 at 4:55 pm

        Yeah, that and Coromandel are the two I have been trying to justify to myself lately. I just can’t do it–and at least the Chanel’s are in those GIANT bottles. I have to console myself with samples. 🙁

        Log in to Reply
        • Joe says:
          24 July 2009 at 5:35 pm

          At least Coromandel is double the volume of juice for the same price and you can sell off some. Splits are the way to go (2-, 3-, 4-way) on those Vats O’ Chanel (i.e., Les Exclusifs).

          Log in to Reply
          • datura5750 says:
            24 July 2009 at 8:56 pm

            Joe, you have to try it, Coromandel = amazing!

          • miss kitty v. says:
            24 July 2009 at 11:38 pm

            Joe, are you trying to rival Daisy as the resident enabler? Don’t encourage me!! Oh, dear…now I’m going to have consider that… Coromandel *is* yummy…

          • Daisy says:
            25 July 2009 at 10:06 pm

            Oh trust me—-Joe is a member in good standing with the Enablers Club…..has the shiny turbo charged membership card with racing stripes on the side!!! In fact, it’s his turn to bring cookies to the meeting….
            Kitty, it sounds to me like you need to get involved in some true splits of Chanel Exclusifs! The juice isn’t so bad per ml…but 200ml is quite a committment! (financially and in terms of usage)

          • miss kitty v. says:
            25 July 2009 at 11:21 pm

            Oh, alright, twist my arm…

          • Daisy says:
            26 July 2009 at 2:31 pm

            **twist, twist** 😉

      • Robin R. says:
        24 July 2009 at 5:17 pm

        “Sheer” and expensive are mutually exclusive terms, my budget advises me. 🙂

        Log in to Reply
        • Robin says:
          24 July 2009 at 6:10 pm

          My budget says: unless they’re Hermessences.

          Log in to Reply
  2. Joe says:
    24 July 2009 at 2:55 pm

    I’m with boojum: I look forward to sampling.

    Speaking of ‘blanche’ scents (and not saying they’re remotely similar): but Lalique White is very worth sampling as well. Just thought I’d give it a plug since I discovered it recently.

    Log in to Reply
    • Daisy says:
      24 July 2009 at 3:01 pm

      Oh great….just toss out the name and that it’s very worth trying….must go look it up….there’s no rest for the perfumed.

      Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      24 July 2009 at 3:07 pm

      I wish it was easier to find Lalique…NM has a few, but not many. I’ll see if they have White.

      Log in to Reply
    • Rictor07 says:
      24 July 2009 at 3:45 pm

      I sampled it recently in a discount store. The top notes are definitely citrus. I dont know about the rest, it didnt blow my mind.

      Log in to Reply
  3. CynthiaW says:
    24 July 2009 at 4:08 pm

    Pink pepper!

    Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      24 July 2009 at 6:10 pm

      See? They all love it.

      Log in to Reply
      • CynthiaW says:
        24 July 2009 at 9:14 pm

        I need a sarcasm indicator – it was more of a comment that yet another scent has pink pepper – lol.

        Log in to Reply
        • Robin says:
          24 July 2009 at 10:35 pm

          No, I knew that! I meant see — the *perfumers* all love to use it. Did that make sense?

          Log in to Reply
          • CynthiaW says:
            24 July 2009 at 11:46 pm

            I got after re-reading (but not before posting) – that’s what happens where you’re hopped up on allergy medicine. I noticed that the new Kenzo has pink pepper, too.

            What the heck does pink pepper smell like, anyhow?

          • Daisy says:
            25 July 2009 at 10:09 pm

            I have no idea either! It is in so many things but I would be hard pressed to identify it….But Tama had a great idea, and I think I’ll try it.

  4. boojum says:
    24 July 2009 at 4:14 pm

    Also now have an annoying itch to know who this mysterious person of inspiration is…

    Log in to Reply
    • Jill says:
      24 July 2009 at 4:24 pm

      Me too!

      Log in to Reply
      • boojum says:
        24 July 2009 at 4:28 pm

        I nominate Angela for that task…seems right up her detective/biopic alley. 🙂

        Log in to Reply
    • Daisy says:
      24 July 2009 at 4:37 pm

      I’ll just assume it’s not Blanche Dubois….nothing sheer and white about that girl!

      Log in to Reply
      • Ailsa says:
        25 July 2009 at 7:49 am

        Blanche Dubois was my first thought when I looked at this! Definitely not one for her.

        I have to say, although I doubt I will get to smell lt, none of those notes are what I would associate as white smells, sounds rather blah. To me, a white perfume would be almondy, snowy and slightly silvery and fizzy, with some sugared anise. And crisp, like when you walk out the door on Christmas morning (definitely a fantasy perfume!)…but I digress :p.

        Log in to Reply
    • angelainthesky says:
      24 July 2009 at 10:30 pm

      Yes, this was my first thought: who is this innocent being with an untainted side (meaning, she/he has a tainted one). It could be a child, a friend, a lover, anyone, really…

      Log in to Reply
  5. melisand61 says:
    24 July 2009 at 4:22 pm

    Oh this does look like a must-try. Rose, violet, aldehydes, woods, musk etc. But I am more than a bit tired of pepper notes. I hope the pink pepper is subtle.

    Log in to Reply
    • miss kitty v. says:
      24 July 2009 at 4:53 pm

      I was thinking the same thing–the pink pepper angle is a little tired. But I’m hopeful: I like floral aldehydes, like woods, like musk. Fingers crossed…

      Log in to Reply
      • mals86 says:
        24 July 2009 at 5:10 pm

        I might be the only person who *isn’t* tired of pink pepper. Possibly because, oh, 60-70% of my samples are classics, so PP is still “different.” That, or it seems more background material to me than it does to everyone else.

        Log in to Reply
        • mals86 says:
          24 July 2009 at 5:17 pm

          Oops, hit “post” too quickly! Anyway, the notes sound riiiiiight up my alley here. Is Byredo too expensive for me? Yep. Will I sample it anyway? Probably. Eventually. After I get tired of chasing down mini bottles of Jolie Madame and L’Heure Bleue and Arpege and Tatiana in parfum and vintage Shocking…

          It is official. I am addicted to ebay. Somebody please stage an intervention… (But seriously, the vintage DVF Tatiana parfum is really great. It’s too bad that one turned into Cheap Drugstore Crap.)

          Log in to Reply
          • Daisy says:
            24 July 2009 at 6:41 pm

            I love it ! A new acronym for the Perfumista Lexicon!!!
            CDC = Cheap Drugstore Crap

            ok, the rest of the world might think : Centers for Disease Control? huh? But WE know……yes we do.

          • angelainthesky says:
            24 July 2009 at 10:30 pm

            Hahahahaha!!!!

          • gvillecreative says:
            25 July 2009 at 8:49 am

            Count me as the second-to-last-person not tired of pink pepper. And this sound right up my alley! I haven’t tried a single Byredo yet (though Pulp keeps tapping on the shoulder and staring me down intensely). I am afraid I will love them. I am also totally addicted to ebay. I figure (like perfume) it’s less a nasty habit than Cocaine, but I still try not to admit it to others.

    • Robin says:
      24 July 2009 at 6:11 pm

      I’m done with pepper too. It actually contributes at this point to making everything smell the same.

      Log in to Reply
  6. ptp says:
    24 July 2009 at 5:02 pm

    Anyone else disappointed that a fragrance representing ‘purity’ looks to be pretty thoroughly gendered instead of even plausibly unisex?

    Log in to Reply
    • boojum says:
      24 July 2009 at 5:31 pm

      Only if by “disappointed” you mean that once again, it’s implied that women ought to be pure, and men have no such requirement. That double standard is far more tired than pink pepper, IMO.

      Log in to Reply
      • Joe says:
        24 July 2009 at 5:42 pm

        Except in perfumery, there are at least as many My Sins and Hotel Sluts as there are Pure White Things… And in any case, to my eyes this Byredo has close to the least amount of gender-politico subtext going on of almost any perfume copy I’ve seen in awhile. Just another POV. 😀

        Log in to Reply
        • ptp says:
          24 July 2009 at 5:53 pm

          Byredo’s track record doesn’t really matter here because Byredo as a company isn’t what I’m disappointed in, just the gendered angle of this specific fragrance and the implicit sexist mentalities brought out in the artist’s description of his inspiration.

          You can’t really divorce the following statement from the implied expectations of gender:

          “I wanted to capture her innocent and untainted side, with a fragrance almost transparent in nature.”

          Untainted from what? The word was meant to be flattering, I’m sure, but deconstruct the phrase and you’ll see what I mean. What does it mean to be untainted? More to the point, what does it mean to be tainted? How can a person be ‘tainted’?

          Log in to Reply
          • monstabunny says:
            25 July 2009 at 2:43 pm

            I was innocent until I discovered my G-spot. Now I’m happily tainted.

        • Daisy says:
          25 July 2009 at 10:12 pm

          MONSTA! put that bunny back in it’s cage….naughty, tainted girl!

          Log in to Reply
      • ptp says:
        24 July 2009 at 5:48 pm

        That’s more or less exactly what I meant, yeah: the continued implication that purity is a virtue that only meaningfully applies to women (and so, of course, women are expected to be ‘pure’) and to a lesser degree that from a male perspective it’s somehow emasculating to be ‘pure’.

        There’s also the flawed concept of purity as a human characteristic, which to me evokes visuals of repressive religious standards, blond-hair blue-eye Aryans and anti-miscegenation laws moreso than beauty or chastity.

        Log in to Reply
        • Joe says:
          24 July 2009 at 6:04 pm

          I’m sorry, I can’t argue with or discuss adequately with you… I put aside Lacan, Blechner, and Butler long ago and gave up all aspirations to academia.

          As Robin might say, “if you have a problem with offensive, generalized, stereotype-laden language, you would be better off not having a perfume hobby.” And I’d add, “at least don’t read the copy.”

          Log in to Reply
          • ptp says:
            24 July 2009 at 6:09 pm

            I’m not an academic and you don’t have to be to have this sort of a discussion. I’m sorry Robin feels that way though because I think it’s a crucial part of self-improvement to be aware of the depth to which stereotypes and generalizations pervade our hobbies and lives. You don’t have to jump off the deep-end and adopt an absolute anti-consumerist lifestyle in order to express a valid critique of the things that surround you unless you feel those things are fundamentally and irreparably broken.

          • Joe says:
            24 July 2009 at 6:39 pm

            I don’t mean this to be flip: I think some of us are plenty aware of the pervasiveness of stereotypes in media/consumer messages. We just choose to get incensed about other things. Personally, the minute I start seeing Aryan iconography in Byredo Blanche, I’m chucking my entire perfume collection. Let’s not even go near Orientalism, okay?

          • Robin says:
            24 July 2009 at 6:42 pm

            ptp, I would agree that it’s important to be aware of the stereotypes & generalizations in perfume advertising as in any sphere. But as ad copy rarely stands up to scrutiny on any level, much less in terms of gender fairness, and as we announce usually between 1 and 3 new fragrances a day…well, let’s just say that’s a subject for another blog.

        • angelainthesky says:
          24 July 2009 at 10:46 pm

          Funny, I am an academic, a feminist and a strong critique of savage capitalism and I try to ignore all the advertising that goes with a perfume because they are usually irritating. But I saw no problem in this particular case. Mostly because the creator of the perfume had one single person in his mind. The purity and untaintedness here was not used to describe women in general, but this one woman, who he sees in this way. What I find really refreshing in this blog is the fact that people are really interested in the perfume juices and not in embodying any idea of cool, sexy, modern etc.. that the companies try to push on us with their bombardment of stereotypes.
          But, ok, this is a subject for another blog, I’ll be quiet now…

          Log in to Reply
          • angelainthesky says:
            24 July 2009 at 11:01 pm

            Sorry, “CRITIC” (English is not my first language).

          • norjunma1 says:
            25 July 2009 at 10:13 am

            Exactly my thoughts Angela. Without placing a creative effort in its proper context, consumers are always left trying to figure it out for themselves, and talking about a creative piece almost always introduces problems with interpretation. The map is not the territory.

            My concern about the current trend in perfumery (at least with the wide-release frags) sort of touches on the pink pepper issue. Almost everything you smell for women that’s widely available is mindless, cookie-cutter, sweet, sugary, well-behaved nonsense. If these frags are somehow considered to be an interpretation of female consumers’ desires and personalities, then it’s a heck of an indictment.

          • mjr17 says:
            25 July 2009 at 11:57 am

            I’m an academic also. But perfume is a hobby of mine. It is a gift I give myself to be able to sniff, enjoy, compare, and read about without the pressures of academia. The closest I get to launching into a cultural studies critique of perfume is my rejection of perfume gender prescriptions – masculine, feminine, etc. It’s tempting, of course, to apply my “skills.” But let’s just say, I’ve resigned myself to the fact that if i spent all my time worrying about ad-copy for perfumes, then I wouldn’t enjoy them as much as I do. because, honestly, it would feel like “work.” (Besides, who cares about ad copy? It scarcely has anything to do with the beauty of the juice.) Thus, I will leave it to other perfume critics and cultural critics to analyze and critique perfume ad copy. Those brilliant people are out there. And I’m sure that when their books/articles are published, I will read them. But for me, just please let me spray myself vigorously and get back to writing MY book, which has nothing to do with perfume, thankfully.

          • angelainthesky says:
            25 July 2009 at 7:18 pm

            Yes Norjunma, there are probably soooo many issues involved in the making of a perfume, I can’t even begin to imagine. It’s probably like the spin-offs or remake of a good movie, which they keep milking and milking until it becomes an embarrassing parody of itself. But I’m sure there will always be a little gem in the midst of the boring stuff.
            Mjir, I too don’t want to mix work with pleasure in this case.

      • Robin says:
        24 July 2009 at 6:32 pm

        In the end, the pink pepper will probably annoy me more than the stereotype 😉

        Log in to Reply
        • boojum says:
          24 July 2009 at 7:59 pm

          LOL! I do find the stereotypes annoying in and of themselves. That said, anyone who knows me will tell you I’m far from being PC, and I find a lot of the concepts just silly. People need to focus on behavior and expectations and quit worrying about word choice, IMO. As for pink pepper, well….my novice nose doesn’t even pick it out yet, so I have awhile before I get annoyed by that. 🙂

          Log in to Reply
          • bergere says:
            24 July 2009 at 8:36 pm

            And really, aren’t we supposed to be concerned with HOW IT SMELLS? Orientalism bothers me just as much as sexism. But, however lame and non-PC the admen or adwomen the manufacturer hired, however slavishly the perfumer conformed to some marketer’s notion, the fragrance should sink or swim on how it smells. And that’s why your blog is important, Robin; at least here one can get non-marketing-influenced impressions on how the stuff smells.

          • angelainthesky says:
            24 July 2009 at 10:50 pm

            Yep! Agreed, also, I feel that novices are welcomed. I haven’t seen any signs of snobbery here.

          • boojum says:
            25 July 2009 at 12:13 am

            Agreed!

    • Momlady says:
      24 July 2009 at 9:26 pm

      Well, if he can’t be Pure..he must be Fresh…or was that Clean?

      Log in to Reply
      • Daisy says:
        24 July 2009 at 11:18 pm

        LOL ! 🙂 maybe he’s fruity?

        Log in to Reply
        • boojum says:
          25 July 2009 at 12:13 am

          LMAO!

          Log in to Reply
  7. Stephen says:
    25 July 2009 at 11:44 am

    I for one am very excited about this.. I have loved all but one of their fragrances ( I think Gypsy Water is a little overrated..), and I truly think this one will be one for the former category…

    Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      25 July 2009 at 8:28 pm

      Hope so!

      Log in to Reply
  8. laken says:
    26 July 2009 at 5:31 am

    what does LMAO mean?

    Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      26 July 2009 at 2:22 pm

      Laughing my a$$ off.

      Log in to Reply
      • laken says:
        26 July 2009 at 4:59 pm

        Oh, thanks R! 🙂

        Log in to Reply
  9. flittersniffer says:
    26 July 2009 at 2:33 pm

    Well, I loved Bal d’Afrique and Fantastic Man, which were soft and understated scents, but was not keen on Pulp or Rose Noir and Green was too green. This one sounds very nice in a CDG White, White Patchouli kind of way. And even if it isn’t like those, it still sounds as though I would like it – and I am in Stockholm in September, as it happens!

    Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      26 July 2009 at 4:01 pm

      You will probably smell it before I will then, do report back!

      Log in to Reply
  10. angelainthesky says:
    26 July 2009 at 4:46 pm

    I went to the Blunda Aromatics happening yesterday and tried the new Yosh fragrances. One of them, Sombra Negra (Black Shadow), has pink pepper but it’s absolutely delicious. I don’t know how to recognize the smell of pink pepper, so I can’t tell you if it’s too prominent in this scent. The list is: vetiver (Madagascar, India, Indonesia, Reunion), patchouli (Indonesia, India), oak moss, tobacco, pink pepper, black pepper, teak (the only non organic ingredient), cypress, davana, opponax, muschroom, organic jojoba oil. My untrained nose detects vetiver, patchouli, cypress, something very green, as in tree green, no grass, and a whiff of something medicinal. It’s at once fresh and woody, bright and dark. It has the strangeness of perfumes such as Dzongkha and Douce Amere but it doesn’t smell like any of these. I’m comparing more the element of surprise that I got from those scents which I also get from Sombra Negra. I bough a small (8 ml I think) little bottle of the oil ($35) and although the silage is not strong, has a good lasting power. Within an hour, it becomes warmer as the medicinal whiff fades. I love it!

    Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      26 July 2009 at 8:33 pm

      How nice — and that’s an excellent price for YOSH, many of her earlier oils are terribly expensive.

      BTW, there is nothing at all wrong with pink pepper, it’s actually a nice smell. It’s just that it’s in many, many perfumes and I get tired of it.

      Log in to Reply
      • angelainthesky says:
        26 July 2009 at 10:06 pm

        Oh, ok. It’s that although it has pink pepper, Sombra Negra doesn’t smell like anything I’ve smelled before. The other perfume is also amazing. It’s called Dew and has fennel amongst other things. It came in a gel form and it doesn’t last too long. I didn’t ask Yosh Han how (or even if) she’s going to put this in the market.

        Log in to Reply
        • Robin says:
          26 July 2009 at 10:16 pm

          Oh, fennel, that sounds fun! Hope we’ll see both of these…Sombra Negra sounds wonderful.

          Log in to Reply
  11. happilykim says:
    30 July 2009 at 3:46 am

    I was just at this wonderful shop in Hamburg yesterday that has this line. Last time I tried the Bal d’ Afrique and even got a sample made by the associate. I really like it. Yesterday I tried Pulp and I am really intrigued with this one, too.

    I wish I had tried the Blanche, it sounds interesting.

    I love this line so far, but honestly, I don’t want 100ml of anything. But if I fall madly in love with one of them, I am sure I will cave in and buy one. I can’t stop thinking about that Pulp, it is really pungent, but in a good way.

    Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      30 July 2009 at 5:36 pm

      Pulp is great fun! I don’t want 100 ml of it either though.

      Log in to Reply
  12. boojum says:
    8 September 2009 at 11:48 pm

    Hmm. I’m going to give this another shot in a few days, but my initial impression is…fabric softener. Very NICE fabric softener, but fabric softener nonetheless. On the plus (?!) side, I think I finally figured out what pink pepper smells like…. Curious to hear what others think.

    Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      9 September 2009 at 12:36 pm

      Oh dear. But I have not smelled it yet.

      Log in to Reply
  13. bluegardenia says:
    28 April 2012 at 10:53 pm

    i love this scent! it is totally unlike anything else i wear, but it’s beautiful. i can see why people say it smells synthetic, and generic, and inexpensive, and innocuous…it’s definitely clean and fresh and soft. laundry-like as they say. it’s also ridiculously overpriced. 220 dollars for this? really? BUT all that said, i still love it! the smell kist makes me giddy. now here’s the kicker though. i shelled out for a full large bottle, and promptly realized i can’t wear it because even though i adore it, without fail i get queasy and nauseous every time i put it on. does this happen to anyone else?! normally when people say of a fragrance, ‘it makes me nauseous’ i assume they just mean they hate it. now i know it’s possible to love a scent and still be made nauseous. sad!

    Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      29 April 2012 at 8:12 am

      Oh, what a terrible shame! I’ve never really heard of that happening with something you love, but for all I know it’s very common.

      Log in to Reply
  14. bluegardenia says:
    28 April 2012 at 10:53 pm

    *sorry meant to write just not kist

    Log in to Reply
  15. bluegardenia says:
    29 April 2012 at 3:48 pm

    It’s funny. The stateside version of tubereuse criminelle does it to me too. And the old one which you could only get in paris didn’t do it. VERY strange. but maybe something to do with a synthetic that’s replaced something else that’s no longer allowed? all i know is it had never happened to me in my life until now!

    Log in to Reply

Leave a reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Advertisement

Search

Recent reviews

Atelier Cologne Love Osmanthus
Moschino Toy Boy
Arquiste Misfit
Diptyque Eau Capitale
Zoologist Bee
Parfum d’Empire Immortelle Corse
Comme des Garcons Series 10 Clash
Frédéric Malle Rose & Cuir
L’Artisan Parfumeur Le Chant de Camargue
Yves Saint Laurent Grain de Poudre
Régime des Fleurs Chloë Sevigny Little Flower
Chanel 1957
Gallivant Los Angeles
Amouage Portrayal Woman

Blogroll

Bois de Jasmin
Grain de Musc
Perfume Posse
The Non-Blonde
More blogs...

Perfumista lists

100 fragrances every perfumista should try
And 25 more fragrances every perfumista should smell
50 masculine fragrances every perfumista should try
26 vintage fragrances every perfumista should try
25 rose fragrances every perfumista should try
11 Cheap Perfumes Beauty Outsiders Love

Favorite posts

The Great Perfume Reduction Plan
Why I Love Old School Chypres
New to perfume and want to learn more?
How to make fragrance last through the day
Fragrance concentrations: sorting it all out
On reformulations, or why your favorite perfume doesn’t smell like it used to
How to get fragrance samples
Perfume for Life: How Long Will Your Fragrance Collection Last?

Upcoming

List of upcoming Friday projects

6 January ~ damage poll

31 January ~ winter reading poll

Back to Top

Home
Archives
About Now Smell This :: Privacy Policy
Perfume Reviews
New Perfumes
General Perfume Articles
The Monday Mail

Glossary of Perfume Terms
Perfume FAQ
Perfume Books

Noses ~ Perfumers A-E :: F-K :: L-S :: T-Z

Perfume Houses A-B :: C :: D-E :: F-G
H-J :: K-L :: M :: N-O :: P :: Q-R :: S
T :: U-Z

Copyright © 2005-2026 Now Smell This. All rights reserved.