• About
  • Login to comment
    • Bluesky
    • RSS
    • Twitter

Now Smell This

a blog about perfume

Menu ▼
  • Perfume Reviews
  • New Perfumes
  • Archives

Bath & Body Works Moonlight Path & Sweet Pea Eau de Parfum, Sarah Jessica Parker Covet ~ new fragrances

Posted by Robin on 11 April 2007 16 Comments

Bath & Body Works Moonlight Path limited edition fragrance

Coming in May from Bath & Body Works, two limited edition fragrances for Mother's Day. Moonlight Path (shown) and Sweet Pea, two classic scents from the Signature Collection, have been reformulated as Eau de Parfums in (lovely!) new collectible bottles:

Moonlight Path is described as...

Mysterious. Romantic. Alluring. To create this lush and romantic interpretation, our master perfumers have carefully blended the scent of lavender, roses and violets with purple orchid and mandarin leaf.

Additional notes include bergamot, black currant, jasmine, lilac, lily, ylang ylang, heliotrope, soft powdery musks, amber, tonka bean, patchouli and vanilla.

Sweet Pea is described as...

Flirtatious. Playful. Enticing. To create this playful and complex interpretation, our master perfumers have carefully blended the scent of pink sweet pea petals and sparkling violets with plum wood, red apple and bergamot.

Additional notes for Sweet Pea include blue freesia, Madonna lily, orange blossom, sandalwood, creamy musk and heliotrope.

Bath & Body Works Moonlight Path and Sweet Pea are $28 each for 100 ml Eau de Parfum, or $19.50 for 180 ml Luxe Body Creme with shea butter. (via press release from Bath & Body works) Update: see a review of Bath & Body Works Sweet Pea.

And finally, a tidbit of news about the long-rumored new fragrance release from Sarah Jessica Parker. According to Women's Wear Daily, it is called "Covet Sarah Jessica Parker", but I think we'll just call it "Sarah Jessica Parker Covet" just to keep our sentiments clear. The only clues about the fragrance itself: a "fougère on estrogen"; the "peridot-hued bottle has a gold herringbone neck and a jeweled top". Macy's (drat!) will have an exclusive starting in July, it rolls out elsewhere in August. Update: see a review of Sarah Jessica Parker Covet.

Filed Under: new fragrances
Tagged With: bbw, celebrity perfumes, sarah jessica parker

Advertisement


16 Comments

Leave a comment, or read more about commenting at Now Smell This. Here's our privacy policy, and a handy emoticon chart.

  1. Anonymous says:
    11 April 2007 at 12:27 pm

    How about, 'Covet Sarah Jessica Parker at Neimans”…sounds much better 🙂

    Honestly, I just didn't 'get' Lovely, even though many people I admire (Chandler Burr included) have gone GAGA over it…maybe Covet will change my mind.

    Log in to Reply
  2. Anonymous says:
    11 April 2007 at 12:30 pm

    ooh! I like fougeres! and I like estrogen, lol! It sounds promising, at the very least.

    Log in to Reply
  3. Anonymous says:
    11 April 2007 at 12:31 pm

    The whole “covet SJP”comment and especially your bracketed monosyllabic gripe toward the end just about sent me rolling on the floor, LOL! Perhaps they'll be nice(r) to you next time? Good luck! 🙂

    Lovely was well… very lovely. I hope she does it even better with this new one (not naming it, LOL)!

    Log in to Reply
  4. Anonymous says:
    11 April 2007 at 12:34 pm

    Well, I would say I admire Lovely but don't have any desire to wear it. It is highly unusual for a celebrity scent — even more so after the deluge of sweet fruity florals since it was released — and I think they did a good job on it. Doubt I'm going to like a fougere on estrogen (love the phrase though) but we'll see!

    Log in to Reply
  5. Anonymous says:
    11 April 2007 at 12:36 pm

    LOL — I like estrogen too! And I like some fougeres. Depends on how heavy they do the lavender, assuming there is any lavender.

    Log in to Reply
  6. Anonymous says:
    11 April 2007 at 12:41 pm

    LOL — maybe I'll do a 5 part series on my efforts to get a sample of Covet from Macy's!

    Log in to Reply
  7. Anonymous says:
    11 April 2007 at 12:49 pm

    great Idea, R. lol!!

    Too bad you couldn't hide a hidden camera in your hat and film every attempt and then montage it. It would be the most hysterical thing ever!!

    Although, you're not too far away from me, maybe I'll come along and set up in the jewelry dept with a mega-zoom mini camera, haha.

    Log in to Reply
  8. Anonymous says:
    11 April 2007 at 2:48 pm

    LOL, the way things are you've got better chances of getting a sample from the much coveted lady herself! 🙂

    Log in to Reply
  9. Anonymous says:
    11 April 2007 at 2:50 pm

    MD, you are the MIchael Moore of perfumery! What a great idea, LOL!

    Log in to Reply
  10. Anonymous says:
    11 April 2007 at 3:57 pm

    Wow, that bottle for Moonlight Path looks like a cross between the new Crabtree & Evelyn Lost / Found bottles and one of the plaid Brit bottles.

    There is nothing new under the sun in bottle design anymore. 😉

    Log in to Reply
  11. Anonymous says:
    11 April 2007 at 4:08 pm

    There is a lot of truth in that!

    Log in to Reply
  12. Anonymous says:
    11 April 2007 at 4:09 pm

    Mark David, it would be hysterical, yes, but guessing it would be more productive for me to wait in Starbucks while you ask for a sample for your wife, LOL…

    Log in to Reply
  13. Anonymous says:
    11 April 2007 at 4:16 pm

    J, just went to peek at the C&E bottles, and yes, I can see the mashup with Brit — still, at least these are pretty, and so many are just dull!

    Log in to Reply
  14. Anonymous says:
    11 April 2007 at 4:23 pm

    Thou shalt not Covet…oh, the jokes, the jokes we can come up with, thank you Sarah Jessica.

    Log in to Reply
  15. Anonymous says:
    11 April 2007 at 4:37 pm

    M, the advertising apparently features SJP behind bars with the idea that she committed a crime to get her hands on the scent…it will be massively comical if the scent is a crime!

    But based on Lovely, doubt that will happen, and we'll probably have to stick with jokes based on the name 🙂

    Log in to Reply
  16. Anonymous says:
    11 April 2007 at 5:25 pm

    we could try both and then you could write an article about which worked better, haha.

    Log in to Reply

Leave a reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Advertisement

Search

Recent reviews

Atelier Cologne Love Osmanthus
Moschino Toy Boy
Arquiste Misfit
Diptyque Eau Capitale
Zoologist Bee
Parfum d’Empire Immortelle Corse
Comme des Garcons Series 10 Clash
Frédéric Malle Rose & Cuir
L’Artisan Parfumeur Le Chant de Camargue
Yves Saint Laurent Grain de Poudre
Régime des Fleurs Chloë Sevigny Little Flower
Chanel 1957
Gallivant Los Angeles
Amouage Portrayal Woman

Blogroll

Bois de Jasmin
Grain de Musc
Perfume Posse
The Non-Blonde
More blogs...

Perfumista lists

100 fragrances every perfumista should try
And 25 more fragrances every perfumista should smell
50 masculine fragrances every perfumista should try
26 vintage fragrances every perfumista should try
25 rose fragrances every perfumista should try
11 Cheap Perfumes Beauty Outsiders Love

Favorite posts

The Great Perfume Reduction Plan
Why I Love Old School Chypres
New to perfume and want to learn more?
How to make fragrance last through the day
Fragrance concentrations: sorting it all out
On reformulations, or why your favorite perfume doesn’t smell like it used to
How to get fragrance samples
Perfume for Life: How Long Will Your Fragrance Collection Last?

Upcoming

List of upcoming Friday projects

6 January ~ damage poll

31 January ~ winter reading poll

Back to Top

Home
Archives
About Now Smell This :: Privacy Policy
Perfume Reviews
New Perfumes
General Perfume Articles
The Monday Mail

Glossary of Perfume Terms
Perfume FAQ
Perfume Books

Noses ~ Perfumers A-E :: F-K :: L-S :: T-Z

Perfume Houses A-B :: C :: D-E :: F-G
H-J :: K-L :: M :: N-O :: P :: Q-R :: S
T :: U-Z

Copyright © 2005-2026 Now Smell This. All rights reserved.