• About
  • Login to comment
    • Bluesky
    • RSS
    • Twitter

Now Smell This

a blog about perfume

Menu ▼
  • Perfume Reviews
  • New Perfumes
  • Archives

Flower by Kenzo Oriental fragrance review

Posted by Robin on 8 November 2005 37 Comments

Flower by Kenzo Oriental

Flower by Kenzo, a perfume inspired by the (scentless) red poppy, was released in 2000. The Flower collection has since been expanded to include several variations on the theme, most notably Flower Le Parfum in 2003. This year Kenzo has launched Flower Oriental. Like the others in the Flower line, it was composed by perfumer Alberto Morillas. According to Women's Wear Daily, the fragrance...

...is based on Kyara, an extract of Asia's agar tree. The material is burned during a Japanese ceremony called Kôdô, which is translated as "listening to incense."

Other fragrance notes include Bulgarian rose, violet, vanilla, musk, Sichuan pepper, and Chinese incense.

I suppose I should start by admitting than I am not a huge fan of the original Flower, which is simply too sweet and powdery to suit me. The Le Parfum version, which is more concentrated but also highlights slightly different notes than the original, is somewhat more to my taste, but it isn't something that I adore either.

Flower Oriental starts quite similar to the original Flower scent: a soft, sweet, powdery floral. As it settles, the powder calms, and it starts to take on dark woody undertones that temper the sweetness nicely. It smells like agarwood (oudh), but a subdued agarwood, completely stripped of its characteristic medicinal topnote. The wood slowly warms into a dry, smoky-peppery incense which obscures the floral top notes, leaving only indistinct traces. It is mildly spicy, with a dash of vanilla and a clean skin musk in the base.

It is a wonderful comfort scent for fall, very squishy-soft, and much lighter and closer to the skin than you might imagine it would be based on the notes. It has just enough powder to lend a velvety finish, but not so much that you feel that you have dusted it on, and there is just enough vanilla to balance the dryness of the wood.

It is still far drier, and probably far less feminine than the original Flower, and I wonder if fans of that scent will find Flower Oriental too masculine. Personally, I tried to amp up the wood notes a notch by layering with Yves Saint Laurent M7, another Alberto Morillas fragrance with agarwood. M7 is a rather heavy fragrance, and even a tiny drop completely drowned out the Kenzo, so I will have to keep working on the proportions. Even on its own, though, Flower Oriental is one of my favorites of the mainstream fragrance releases this year.

Flower Oriental is available in 50 ml Eau de Parfum for $70 at sephora and department stores. I will be waiting patiently for it to hit the discounters.

Included in...

5 Perfumes for: Creatures of the Night
Powder cravings

Possibly also of interest

Kenzo L’Eau Pure ~ new fragrance
Kenzo Flower Cherry Poppy ~ new perfume

Filed Under: perfume talk
Tagged With: alberto morillas, flanker, kenzo, powdery

Advertisement


37 Comments

Leave a comment, or read more about commenting at Now Smell This. Here's our privacy policy, and a handy emoticon chart.

  1. Anonymous says:
    8 November 2005 at 11:41 am

    I have a feeling this would be a fragrance for me. I do like the original Flower (have a bottle). But I cannot find it here and I spoke with someone at a perfume store yesterday and they think maybe it is not released here yet. If I cannot find it, I am tempted to order it from the States, site unsniffed.

    Log in to Reply
  2. Anonymous says:
    8 November 2005 at 12:05 pm

    I do agree with your lovely review dear R! It is indeed one of the nicer mainstream perfumes this year.

    Hope you are well.

    Log in to Reply
  3. Anonymous says:
    8 November 2005 at 12:16 pm

    Dear R, I'm not much of a fan of the original Flower either – there's too much…heliotrope? The new one seemed much more attractive when I first sprayed it on, but gradually it lost its lustre and became simply Flower. I was a bit surprised, as I'd heard that it was an entirely new scent, but it did seem to me to be the original Flower with extra bits! It makes me wary of the LE l'Instant Noel or whatever it's called – that smelled nice in the bottle, but I wonder if the honey magnolia note that emerges in l'Instant would come to the fore here too? I must say, though, that I do love the Flower bottles – I really wish I could like the scent more… N

    Log in to Reply
  4. Anonymous says:
    8 November 2005 at 12:34 pm

    I could barely smell this! I had to really spritz heavily. It didn't seem to last either. I had high hopes since I love Le Parfum. It's going straight to my swap list. Very disappointing.

    Victoria O.

    Log in to Reply
  5. Anonymous says:
    8 November 2005 at 12:39 pm

    K, I will be curious to hear what a Flower fan thinks of it. It is quite different from the earlier versions, in smell but also in feel. Personally I am a cheapskate and won't pay full price for it…eventually it will be at the discounters for much less money.

    Log in to Reply
  6. Anonymous says:
    8 November 2005 at 12:42 pm

    N, I am surprised — I would not have thought you would like it! But not sure I can say why.

    Log in to Reply
  7. Anonymous says:
    8 November 2005 at 12:44 pm

    N, LOL at “Flower with extra bits”! But we had the opposite reaction: I thought it started out Flower, and got less & less Flower-like as it dried down.

    My sephora doesn't have the new L'Instant yet! They say they've never heard of it, despite the fact that it is on their own website.

    Log in to Reply
  8. Anonymous says:
    8 November 2005 at 12:45 pm

    V, agree that it is very light. I tend to wear my perfume lightly anyway — one spray is usually more than enough. With FO, yes, you have to spritz heavily. I don't mind, but it does perhaps explain why I am playing around with the M7.

    Log in to Reply
  9. Anonymous says:
    8 November 2005 at 12:48 pm

    It sounds lovely…but so did the previous Flower versions, and, just like Victoria O. above, I could not smell any of them. I swear. Just no smell, only a hint of slightly powdery sweetness…weird. I am going to try this one anyway, thank you for the lovely review, R!

    Log in to Reply
  10. Anonymous says:
    8 November 2005 at 12:49 pm

    I found it, well, I found out how to get it here, and will let you know as soon as I get my hands on it. Flower is the lightest and definitely the most powdery scent I own, as I like woody and spicey scents (especially this time of year). The next perfume I am getting is Rance's Josephine, and maybe this Kenzo Oriental as well, if it smells as good as it sounds.

    Log in to Reply
  11. Anonymous says:
    8 November 2005 at 12:50 pm

    I tried this twice and did not want to wash off. 🙂

    Did you think I would not like it because I am such an awful snob?

    ;D

    Log in to Reply
  12. Anonymous says:
    8 November 2005 at 1:04 pm

    Glad you found it, and hope you like it!

    Log in to Reply
  13. Anonymous says:
    8 November 2005 at 1:09 pm

    N, LOL — not at all, I just don't think of you wearing squishy-comfort scents.

    Log in to Reply
  14. Anonymous says:
    8 November 2005 at 1:10 pm

    Well, M, then I wonder if you will be able to smell this one — it is very light!

    Log in to Reply
  15. Anonymous says:
    8 November 2005 at 1:11 pm

    I probably won't…oh well! 🙂

    Log in to Reply
  16. Anonymous says:
    8 November 2005 at 2:00 pm

    I fell for Rahat this year (after years of hating it) – so that is proof that I am getting really soppy and comfort oriented. 😉

    Log in to Reply
  17. Anonymous says:
    8 November 2005 at 2:03 pm

    PBI – blame the web designers/project managers for not keeping the staff there informed. It is the same here in Paris btw – nobody has a clue what is on their own website except clients and the developers who created the sites! Huge communication gap there. This is the case with most companies these days. SAs cannot be bothered nor care.

    Log in to Reply
  18. Anonymous says:
    8 November 2005 at 2:19 pm

    I really have come to appreciate the first Flower. To me, that is a clean, soft, comfort scent. I am strongly intrigued by the Oriental version, and after reading this I'm sure I'll have to track it down here. I'm sure I'll find it interesting. Although, I just generally (not always) dig the stuff Morillas comes up with anyhow!

    Log in to Reply
  19. Anonymous says:
    8 November 2005 at 3:58 pm

    R, I have to try it over the weekend. That is all I have to say! It sounds too lovely to pass up.

    Log in to Reply
  20. Anonymous says:
    8 November 2005 at 5:15 pm

    Well, then I must be more soppy since I liked it the first time I smelled it!

    Log in to Reply
  21. Anonymous says:
    8 November 2005 at 5:27 pm

    K, will love to hear what you think of it since you like the original.

    Log in to Reply
  22. Anonymous says:
    8 November 2005 at 5:29 pm

    Excellent review Robin! It sounds like it has great potential. I ordered the original Flower based on reviews and fell in love with it. However, I can't breathe once I spray it on. It's the strangest thing! I am not allergic to any other perfume but Flower and I'm bummed. I'm almost hesitant to try the FO because of the note similarities. Maybe I should love this from afar….boo hoo. I do sit the Flower bottle proudly on my vanity though! Thanks for the insight. Toodles.

    Log in to Reply
  23. Anonymous says:
    8 November 2005 at 5:32 pm

    V, hope you will review it on Bois de Jasmin — very curious to hear what you think of it.

    Log in to Reply
  24. Anonymous says:
    8 November 2005 at 5:59 pm

    I like the Flower Parfum, but I didn't care for Flower Oriental. The top notes were fabulous, a delicate incense layered over a light original Flower scent, but then the drydown went into an unpleasant sharp chemical odor. So disappointing.

    Log in to Reply
  25. Anonymous says:
    8 November 2005 at 6:24 pm

    I have pretty much the same reaction to Narciso Rodriguez, and haven't been willing to risk trying the new EdP version. Not worth it!

    Log in to Reply
  26. Anonymous says:
    8 November 2005 at 6:27 pm

    T, I read another comment somewhere else about a chemical odor, so you are not alone! I don't get that at all, happily, just wood & incense & spice.

    Log in to Reply
  27. Anonymous says:
    9 November 2005 at 12:13 pm

    Hmm, it sounds pretty interesting. I'll give it a go. I seem not to be able to wear 'perfumey' perfumes lately. If I recall correctly, the original Flower was really perfumey.

    Log in to Reply
  28. Anonymous says:
    10 November 2005 at 6:22 am

    I found it! It just went on the shelves today here, and I even got them to make me a sample. I sprayed it on an hour ago, and I just LOVE it. I love the woody tones and slightly spicey pepper and incense tones it takes on after about 20 minutes (on my skin). It stays very close to the skin, which if fine with me as fragrance for me is a personal experience. As soon as my sample is gone, a bottle will be purchased.

    Log in to Reply
  29. Anonymous says:
    10 November 2005 at 11:49 am

    K, that was quick, so glad you found it & liked it and didn't have to order unsniffed. I am going to be patient & wait for it to appear at discount…I just can't stand to pay full price for something and see it later at 30% off.

    Log in to Reply
  30. Anonymous says:
    29 December 2006 at 10:58 pm

    When I first saw this on the shelf at Nordstrom I was hoping it was a FlowerbyKenzo for men. I paid no attention to the fact that it was grouped with the original FLowerbyKenzo (as well as the Le Parfum and other women's Kenzo fragrances). When I smelled it, it definitley seemed masculine to me. But after I realized it was for women, I tried to wrap my mind around the idea that it was indeed a woman's fragrance. I couldn't. It doesn't smell very feminine at all. But I think I'll buy a bottle for myself. I'm very into these oriental fragrances right now (namely Shiseido Basala), and I love the way this one smells like incense. Peronsally, I don't mind paying full retail for it… 😛

    Log in to Reply
  31. Anonymous says:
    30 December 2006 at 10:30 am

    It isn't terribly feminine, is it? It was supposed to be a limited edition, and I need to get a bottle too before it disappears.

    Log in to Reply
  32. Anonymous says:
    30 December 2006 at 1:33 pm

    Oh my heavens! It's limited edition? Oh dear… I definitley need to get to the mall and get some. Thanks for the heads up!

    Log in to Reply
  33. Anonymous says:
    30 December 2006 at 7:41 pm

    You know, it might be worth asking. I heard it was, but now actually not sure it was ever confirmed.

    Log in to Reply
  34. Anonymous says:
    7 January 2007 at 11:15 pm

    So asked the lady at Nordstrom if it was going to be limited edition, and she said that it was originally planned to be (she thought), but they keep stocking it up (which was clear; they had a LOT on the shelf). I decided, then, not to buy it right away. She made me up a sample (which I am wearing right now, and love), as well as a sample of the FlowerbyKenzo Summer, which I gave to my mom. It's funny, how I've like the other three version of FlowerbyKenzo (the third being Le Parfum), but not the original.

    Log in to Reply
  35. Anonymous says:
    8 January 2007 at 12:48 pm

    Well, even if it is LE (and the salespeople rarely know for sure) it will be around for awhile. And you can still find it at discount online.

    Log in to Reply
  36. tanyaling says:
    12 November 2009 at 1:42 am

    This smells better than the new Kenzo Flower Essentielle. I tried on both wrists. This smells lighter and more soothing, as well as slightly more powdery. Could be because of the tropical climate here….

    Log in to Reply
    • Robin says:
      12 November 2009 at 2:38 pm

      I like it better too, although Essentielle is beautifully done.

      Log in to Reply

Leave a reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Advertisement

Search

Recent reviews

Atelier Cologne Love Osmanthus
Moschino Toy Boy
Arquiste Misfit
Diptyque Eau Capitale
Zoologist Bee
Parfum d’Empire Immortelle Corse
Comme des Garcons Series 10 Clash
Frédéric Malle Rose & Cuir
L’Artisan Parfumeur Le Chant de Camargue
Yves Saint Laurent Grain de Poudre
Régime des Fleurs Chloë Sevigny Little Flower
Chanel 1957
Gallivant Los Angeles
Amouage Portrayal Woman

Blogroll

Bois de Jasmin
Grain de Musc
Perfume Posse
The Non-Blonde
More blogs...

Perfumista lists

100 fragrances every perfumista should try
And 25 more fragrances every perfumista should smell
50 masculine fragrances every perfumista should try
26 vintage fragrances every perfumista should try
25 rose fragrances every perfumista should try
11 Cheap Perfumes Beauty Outsiders Love

Favorite posts

The Great Perfume Reduction Plan
Why I Love Old School Chypres
New to perfume and want to learn more?
How to make fragrance last through the day
Fragrance concentrations: sorting it all out
On reformulations, or why your favorite perfume doesn’t smell like it used to
How to get fragrance samples
Perfume for Life: How Long Will Your Fragrance Collection Last?

Upcoming

List of upcoming Friday projects

6 January ~ damage poll

31 January ~ winter reading poll

Back to Top

Home
Archives
About Now Smell This :: Privacy Policy
Perfume Reviews
New Perfumes
General Perfume Articles
The Monday Mail

Glossary of Perfume Terms
Perfume FAQ
Perfume Books

Noses ~ Perfumers A-E :: F-K :: L-S :: T-Z

Perfume Houses A-B :: C :: D-E :: F-G
H-J :: K-L :: M :: N-O :: P :: Q-R :: S
T :: U-Z

Copyright © 2005-2026 Now Smell This. All rights reserved.